Pixelated Intifada: An Interview with Palestinian Filmmaker Amer Shomali

[Image via Amer Shomali] [Image via Amer Shomali]

Pixelated Intifada: An Interview with Palestinian Filmmaker Amer Shomali

By : Isis Nusair

This interview was conducted in Ramallah, Palestine on 16 June 2015 following the local and international release of Amer Shomali’s film, The Wanted 18, which opens in US theaters on 19 June 2015.

Isis Nusair (IN): Where did the idea of the film come from?

Amer Shomali (AS): I grew up in the Yarmouk [Refugee] Camp in Syria. During the first intifada (in 1987), my parents would tell me stories about Palestine. As a kid, they could not tell me all that was happening. I remember one story about an uncle who was arrested by the Israeli authorities after he was hiding in a palm tree! These stories about Palestine and the nature of the people stayed with me. I was obsessed at the time with superheroes and comic books like Asterix and Tintin.  I understood Palestine through these books; it was an illogical and imaginary place for me.

When we returned [to Palestine] after the Oslo Accords in 1997, there was disappointment and shock. Palestine was not what I imagined.  Then I met someone from Beit Sahour who told me, “everything you imagined about the first intifada was real but you came at the wrong time.” The Wanted 18 is a film that transports the audience back into that period, where they can relive those experiences. I found out that even the people of Beit Sahour themselves had the desire to live through that period. They opened their houses to the crew and provided us with archival material of pictures and home movies.  They helped in all the details of making the film.  They would advise on which of their children should play their roles, how they should dress, and how to represent the first intifada.

IN: The film comes across as a theatrical performance enacted by the people of Beit Sahour.

AS: I wanted to recreate the intifada in a theatrical way and see how the different generations would interact with each other. People were so engaged with the film and every house became like a studio. They would invite us over, and prepare a cup of tea before we started shooting. The people of Beit Sahour claimed the film and its discourse. It took five years to complete the research for the film. We used to share the stories with the people and they would become part of the process of documenting the history. The town became like one big operation room.

At the last day of shooting we were supposed to film a demonstration. We needed fifty people. Early that morning, I appeared at the local radio station and requested an intifada song. I asked people on the air to come dressed in dark clothes for the scene. Two hundred people showed up and many of them became like assistant directors giving us advice on how things needed to be. This gave them ownership over the narrative of the film.

IN: What about the ending of the film?

AS: I left the ending of the film open, where one of the cows is ready to return at any time if we are willing to go into the desert and look for her. It is the same desert the youth of the first intifada used to escape and hide from the Israeli soldiers and later from the Oslo process, and where Jesus sought refuge.

IN: There is a thin line between fiction and documentary in the film.

AS: We do not have an archive of the first intifada. We have an archive filmed by foreign crews. The dominant image of the first intifada was of Israeli soldiers breaking the hands of Palestinians and of Palestinian children throwing stones at Israeli soldiers.  There were no images, for example, of Palestinians milking cows. The civil disobedience was an attempt to separate from the Israeli occupation, and the animation in the film is an attempt to create an alternative archive. The film tells the story from the memory and point of view of the cows.  It is easy at times for the “West” to identify with the cows more than with Palestinians. The film is a story of how the cows lived under the Israeli occupation.

\"\" 

IN: What about gender relations in the film?

AS: Anton’s mom, her sister and Siham are very powerful characters in the film. People used to tell us their stories and cry. Even men cried except for Anton’s mom. It is as if the tears had dried in her eyes. As we were preparing for the film and consulting people, women had a different point of view to share. They were the ones who told us, for example, about the cow that was crying as she gave birth. The way Siham told the story opens new venues for empathy. Women during the first intifada were taking leading roles and were at the frontlines of demonstrations against the (Israeli) occupation.

IN: Why is it important for you to express that longing for the first intifada?

AS: I feel selfish for being able to create that period and be in touch with my childhood memories and history. The film is not regressive and does not idealize the past. It is an attempt to understand the past in order to be able to move forward. People at the time wanted a third option; an alternative. The two extreme options that were available were either to emigrate or explode. I do not want to be part of the occupation machinery and the solutions imposed on us. That is where the longing for the past comes from.

IN: How does your film connect to the current Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement?

AS: I studied at Birzeit University and in Canada and Britain. I designed some posters for the initial boycott movement (available at www.amershomali.info). Today the movement is stronger conceptually. During the first intifada, they wanted to create alternatives and that is where the idea for civil disobedience came from. Currently, there is no clear Palestinian national and local project, yet internationally, and with the help of the BDS movement, there is more awareness. People have a role to play and it is great to see them play that role. The boycott is not only about Israel but about fair trade and creating different alternatives and standards of living. We are part of this process.

IN: How was the experience of co-directing the film with the Canadian Paul Cowan?

AS: Paul and I are different in age and in our sense of humor and this became an added value to the film in terms of having a solid structure and narrative. I wanted it to be a comedy and a fantasy-like movie. We reached a common place where the context of the film became clear to the audience and where Westerners could understand it without it becoming too boring for Palestinians. There is a thin line between comedy and fantasy.  One of the scenes in the film is similar to The Godfather, and in another [Yasser] Arafat resembles [Theodore] Herzl as he dreams of the future state. It is interesting to see in each screening what people find funny and what shakes them to the core.

I publish comic strips in al-Safir and al-Akhbar newspapers. I use comedy as a way to reach people. Those who are unable to make fun of their wounds are unable to heal them. I wanted to convey our issues in an honest way. I am looking for empathy and not sympathy, and for the audience to put themselves in the position of the cows and understand why they think the way they do. The film is not educational, it is supposed to be fictional and entertaining. The characters collapse after twelve minutes as in Hollywood action films. The cows are like a Trojan Horse. You start to love them and then you feel stuck as you might start loving the Palestinians as well! Historically, we were represented in Hollywood films in a very negative way. I am hijacking the same Hollywood structure and visuals to tell a story that is opposite to what is usually told.

IN: You were denied permit recently by the Israeli authorities to get to the American Consulate in Jerusalem to obtain a visa for the screening of the film at the Human Rights Watch Film Festival in New York.

AS: More than fifty percent of the requests to enter Jerusalem are denied on the basis of security. I could leave the country through Amman but I am denied access to Jerusalem that is only several kilometers away. This is about collective punishment and not security threats. Even the cows in the film are a security threat!

IN: How was the film received?

AS: The film was screened at the Toronto Film Festival last September and since then it had participated in film festivals in Abu Dhabi, Carthage, Lyon, and Addis Ababa among others. The response has been amazing. Half of the audience for the film is usually Jewish. One woman told me recently, “I am Jewish and I am glad I saw the film. I never saw this side of Palestinians and of Israel.” I wonder what kind of propaganda films she has been seeing where the educated Palestinian who is dressed nicely and wants to improve his situation does not exist, and where there is no mention of Israel chasing cows (as a security threat)!

IN: How did you get access to interview the military governor and his deputy?

AS: It was important for me to interview the Israeli military governor of Beit Sahour during the first Intifada.  We were denied access to the Israeli military archives and to how they used to confiscate people’s furniture. In the end, we were able to reach the military governor and his deputy and asked them several questions about the first intifada including some about the cows!

Film Trailer

 

Film Poster

\"\"

  • ALSO BY THIS AUTHOR

    • Dystopian and Alternate Realities: An Interview with Lyd filmmakers, Sarah Ema Friedland and Rami Younis

      Dystopian and Alternate Realities: An Interview with Lyd filmmakers, Sarah Ema Friedland and Rami Younis

      As an American Jew, we are literally taught an alternate reality, taught an alternate history. The Zionist project of creating the state of Israel is a world building project. The reality we live in is like science fiction, and that surrealness was one of the biggest inspirations for the science fiction elements of the film. To build a nation, you need to create a mythology. The mythology of the state of Israel that we all are taught and kind of brainwashed with is what sustains the occupation. It is so deep. We already talked about changing names on streets and calling Lyd Lod.

    • Obscurity and a Drop of Hope: Interview with Syrian Filmmaker, Soudade Kaadan

      Obscurity and a Drop of Hope: Interview with Syrian Filmmaker, Soudade Kaadan

      This interview was conducted with Syrian filmmaker Soudade Kaadan following the release of her recent films, Aziza (2019), The Day I Lost My Shadow (2018), and Obscure (2017). The Day I Lost my Shadow won in 2018 the Lion of the Future - “Luigi De Laurentiis” Venice Award for a Debut Film.

    • عتمة وبعض من الأمل: مقابلة مع المخرجة السورية سؤدد كعدان

      عتمة وبعض من الأمل: مقابلة مع المخرجة السورية سؤدد كعدان

      أجري هذا اللقاء عقب عرض أفلام المخرجة السورية سؤدد كعدان التي تضمنت «عزيزة» (٢٠١٩)، «يوم أضعت ظلي» (٢٠١٨) و«عتمة» (٢٠١٧). حصل فيلم «يوم أضعت ظلي» على جائزة «أسد المستقبل» لأول عمل روائي في مهرجان فينيسيا للأفلام.

The Pursuit of Heroes in Palestinian Cinema: An Interview with Annemarie Jacir

["When I Saw You" is being screened at the DC Palestinian Film and Arts Festival this week. The next showing is Thursday 3 October 2013 at 8:30 PM at the Goethe Institute.]

Where do young Palestinians today look for real heroes—individuals who are brave and noble and inspire others to be brave and noble? This is a recurring theme in current Palestinian art, particularly in two of the past year’s most decorated Palestinian films, one a documentary and one a narrative feature. Annemarie Jacir’s narrative When I Saw You [Lamma Shoftak] and Mahdi Fleil’s A World Not Ours [Alam Laysa Lana] have overlapped and shared the awards stage on the international film festival circuit on several occasions. 

A source for heroes is heart-wrenchingly absent in A World Not Ours. Filmed in today’s Ain Al Helweh refugee camp in Lebanon, the young men in the documentary have lost their belief in saviors, past and future, let alone the dream of being one. Palestinian heroes, among their generation, are indeed part of a world not theirs.  

The past is a more fruitful place for heroes in Annemarie Jacir’s more lyrical When I Saw You. Set in 1967, right after the Israeli occupation of the West Bank, When I Saw You centers on Tarek (Mahmoud Asfa), a young boy who secretly ventures beyond his new home, a camp where he lives with his mother (Ruba Blal). His walk into the desolate hills of Jordan inadvertently leads him into the secluded training grounds of the first Palestinian fedayeen, and he discovers a different way of looking at the world from that of the bleak refugee camp: he discovers heroes—particularly under the surrogate fatherhood of one of the young men, played by Saleh Bakri.

But optimism is a relative word in Palestinian cinema, and even the sunny moments in Jacir’s film are darkened because we—both the audience and Jacir herself—know what comes later. 

When I Saw You was Palestine’s official entry for the Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film. It debuted at the 2012 Toronto Film Festival and then shared most of the top awards at the 2012 Abu Dhabi Film Festival. When I Saw You went on to shine at the Berlin International Film Festival, taking the NETPAC Critics Award for Best Asian Film. When I Saw You also won the International Federation of Film Societies` Don Quixote Award at the Carthage International Film Festival, the Jury Prize at the Cairo International Film Festival, and the Special Jury Prize at the Oran Arab Film Festival. Its star, Mahmoud Afsa, was also nominated for the Young Artists Award in Los Angeles.

When I Saw You is Jacir’s second narrative feature, after Salt of This Sea [Milh Hadha al Bahr], which also stars Saleh Bakri, and this is the second time her film has served as Palestine’s official submission to the Academy Awards. Salt of This Sea tells the story of Soraya (Suheir Hammad), a Palestinian American woman returning to Jaffa on behalf of her family to reclaim the money her grandfather was forced to leave in the bank when he was exiled in 1948. When she meets Bakri’s character, a young man who struggles with the obstacles of being a Palestinian whose family was not exiled, her idealized image of Palestine is challenged by reality. 

But Soraya doesn’t fade away. She takes matters into her own hands. For people who have met her, Jacir shares Soraya’s determination, although Jacir is stronger willed. It is this strength that helped her achieve the title of first female Palestinian director of a feature film for Salt of This Sea, a film that debuted at the Cannes Film Festival in 2008. 

Four years later, When I Saw You has a higher level of sublety and the markings of a more sophisticated director, as reflected in the outstanding performances she gets out of the actors and the more complexly told story. We talked with Annemarie about the film and filmmaking in general.

Alia Yunis (AY): What drew you to the setting and time period of When I Saw You?

Annemarie Jacir (AJ): It’s a tremendously important year for us. I never lived 1967, but I grew up hearing about it all my life. Although that year was a great tragedy for my family, it was also a time of great hope in the world. Like the late sixties everywhere, people were going through a kind of rebirth, an infectious sense of hope that they could change their own lives. Student movements, anti-colonial movements, civil rights…I wanted to tell a story about this important time, not to be nostalgic but rather because it is so relevant. I started writing the script at a time where I was in need of hope in my own life, and in what I saw going on around me, in my own generation.

AY: Notably, the film was entirely financed by Palestinian investors and all the producers were Palestinian. You say the film was made with a fourth of the budget you had originally hoped for. How did you make it happen and what was the process of working?

AJ: It took us years to make it happen, but I wanted to look to our own community to support its artists instead of always looking to Europe or elsewhere. It was so special to have this all-Arab team. I took about one year to write the script and about three years to finance the film. We managed to raise the minimum with these Palestinian investors and support from the Dubai Film Connection, Abu Dhabi’s Sanad Fund, and AFAC. We only had enough to shoot and we took the risk to shoot because I didn’t want to lose the chance to work with Mahmoud, the eleven-year-old lead. He would have been too old in a year. After wrapping, it then took us over a year to finish the film in postproduction, as we had no funds at all to complete the film. We were able to finish the film finally with the support Thessaloniki Film Festival’s “Agora” award and lots of in-kind sponsors.

AY: Mahmoud Asfa is the first Arab child to be nominated for the Young Actors Award. How did you find him?  

AJ: I combed Jordan and Palestine looking for the boy who could play Tarek. We saw about two hundred kids, in schools, in drama classes, in refugee camps, word-of-mouth, open casting calls. On one visit to an UNRWA school in the Irbid refugee camp, Mahmoud’s headmaster introduced him to us. I knew immediately he was Tarek.  

AY: Mahmoud had never acted before, and a recent study revealed that Arab filmmakers believe that one of the toughest challenges these days is finding good actors. The actors in your film are exceptionally fine in their roles. As a director, how did you work to bring out their performances?

AJ: I love working with actors. It’s the most important process in many ways. For When I Saw You, I didn’t give them the script and I never told them the whole story. In life we don’t know the whole story, so I tell my actors what they need to know so we can build their characters. And most of all, I work with them on the backstory, who they are, where they are coming from…all the details of their lives but not the script. If they know themselves well, then the rest will come easier and much later in the process, sometimes on set. I worked with Mahmoud for four months before we shot; there is nothing more precious that that time together.

AY: The music in the film is particularly moving, specifically the scene where the fedayeen are all singing by the fire. How did you go about choosing the music? 

AJ: In the late 1960s, Palestinians were very much connected to what was happening all over the world—they were listening to Arabic classics and also creating a new kind of music, influenced from both their east and their west, and pushing boundaries, as in their own lives. 

I worked with long-time collaborator Kamran Rastegar on the original track and also research. We discovered a lot of obscure musicians and bands of the time: Lebanese rock, Armenian fusion, Egyptian jazz, Moroccan avant-garde Gnawa, some really fun stuff, and that is what we hear on the radio most of the time in the film—other than the constant news broadcasts. In terms of the film’s live music, the first piece, around the fire, is an original song written and sung for the film by Ruba Shamshoum, a new jazz singer. 

There was certain magic in the time before TVs and computers, and when people were together they would sing. I wanted to break the rhythm of the film with this unusually long sequence, to change the pace so we would linger on the faces of these young men and women, each with their own stories, depth, nostalgia, madness—people so famously absent from the media normally. The second piece, which leads into the dancing, is one of the most famous Palestinian resistance songs, “Akka’s Prison,” written in 1930 against British rule, as a commemoration to three men who were hung, and a call to continue the struggle for freedom. 

Q: The organizers of the Toronto Film Festival called When I Saw You “a poetic tour de force.” But there has also been criticism from some Palestinians and others that say you romanticized the fedayeen or looked at them with too much nostalgia. How would you respond to that? 

AJ: Of course I have romanticized them. Why do people accept being romantic about Che Guevara or Braveheart but not about Palestinians? Isn’t there something racist in that? 

They were romantic, young people…and so am I. Otherwise they wouldn’t have been doing what they were doing. They believed they could change their world and there was something better out there for them—that is a totally romantic way of living.

I am not making a documentary about the fedayeen but rather telling a fictional story that captures a certain mood. For me film works closely to poetry in that way. The film is from a child’s point of view as well. It’s not from the point of view of an intellectual in 2012 who knows how wrong everything went. We know that part of the story, and that’s the point. In the end, one has to read the film on a deeper level. On the surface the film is a romantic homage to that generation, but more than that, it is also a deep criticism and poses a serious question to them. The inner fighting, the rising egos, the boyish behavior...So finally in the end our hero Tarek sees them as only rhetoric. The film is about Tarek moving beyond the fedayeen. They are left behind. That’s the point. The last word of the film, which Layth says, is "wait,” a word which comes up in the film several times. It’s the word Tarek rejects.  

AY: Today, Tarek, the main character, would be in his fifties. Where do you imagine he would be in this world, given the status of Palestine today? 

AJ: This film intentionally does not extend further than the time period it takes place in, 1967-1968. Everyone knows very well what happens next—Black September, in-fighting, splinter movements, corruption, the horrid Oslo process. So many things went wrong. So many dreams were stolen. I wanted to give a hint of that in When I Saw You. You feel an undercurrent of in-fighting, egos starting to take shape amongst the fighters, different ideas forming. But the film is only about the moment before that. I leave it to you to tell me where you think Tarek is at fifty. 

AY: Recently I was speaking with someone who works for a European film financing organization. He said, in awe and fear, that “Palestinian women are so fierce—when you talk to them about their films they’re very straight up and clear. You don’t mess with them.” True?  

AJ: Ha ha! I love it. What can I say to that? My mother is a tough woman. She’s sharp as a razor, straight and clear. Living in Palestine, I was always aware how many women run organizations, are the main breadwinners in their households, are active community leaders, and so on. As Palestinians, everyone is always trying to render our voices silent and to twist what we say around, so perhaps that’s why we’ve learned to be very clear. 

AY: Indiewire called When I Saw You "one of the best works to come out of the current explosion in filmmaking in the Middle East." How sustainable do you see this explosion, given that you and your husband have set up your own production company, Philistine Films, to develop regionally-based film projects?

AJ: I think there are very talented people in the Arab world, and we’re going to see a lot more great films. Personally, I hope to see more films push the limits and do daring and creative things, even if they are flawed. I always prefer to see a flawed film with a lot of soul than a perfectly crafted film that takes me nowhere. 

In regards to your question about how sustainable is this explosion, in many ways it depends on the support these filmmakers get. If the support is there, and the bar is raised, they can do it. It’s going to be fun. 

AY: How do you feel you have evolved as a director over the years? 

AJ: Each film is different, and I feel I am always moving between experimental, documentary, and fiction work. Some films are more "experimental" or tending towards poetry more, and sometimes leaning more to emotions and instinct. At other times, I am more interested in playing with a different kind of narrative structure. In the fourteen or so films I`ve made, I can say I am always searching for something, always trying to make one film very different from the next, and always learning and trying to improve my craft. 

AY: How was the making of this film different from Salt of this Sea

AJ: Salt of this Sea took six years to make and was done through a co-production of eight countries. When I Saw You was shot with a Palestinian producer and all Arab money, most of it private investors and funds. 

Salt of this Sea was shot in a guerrilla-like style under military occupation with a Palestinian crew who were not allowed freedom of movement. When I Saw You was shot entirely in Jordan, and in two locations, which were entirely constructed. We built the entire set of the fictional Harir Refugee camp from scratch, whereas Salt of this Sea is entirely set in actual Palestinian cities and villages. That is except for the airport—unlike other films, we were not given permission to shoot there, so we had to build the arrivals area. Oh! And there is one scene in the film, which had to be re-shot. It was after I got denied entry by the Israeli authorities and could not return, so we had to shoot it in Marseille, France. 

AY: How do you feel about your film playing at the DCPFAF which is unique for its emphasis on storytelling and Palestinian subjectivity?  Is that a different experience than when the film plays within the context of an international film festival?

AJ:  Every festival brings in its own audience. What is special about DCPFAF is that is has outreach to the Palestinian and Arab community in DC and this means that people who don`t follow cinema on a general level or follow film festivals and world cinema, might be reached through DCPFAF.  This is hugely important. We need to reach our own community and have their support too. It`s the only way we can strengthen and grow. 

AY: And finally, where would you tell young Palestinians to look for inspiration today?

AJ: I would tell young boys and girls today to look for their heroes in their own neighborhood, amongst the people they know who have difficult lives and continue to believe in a better world…Heroes are regular people.