An Open Letter to the World Bank’s Board of Directors: Stop the Bisri Dam in Lebanon!

An Open Letter to the World Bank’s Board of Directors: Stop the Bisri Dam in Lebanon!

An Open Letter to the World Bank’s Board of Directors: Stop the Bisri Dam in Lebanon!

By : Roland Nassour

On behalf of Lebanon Eco Movement, a network of 60 environmental NGOs, I am writing as the coordinator of The National Campaign to Protect the Bisri Valley to let you know of our major concerns regarding the World Bank-funded Bisri Dam in Lebanon.

If implemented, the dam will destroy one of the most important landscapes in the Middle East, devastating six million square meters of forests and agricultural lands, and dismantling more than fifty archeological and historical sites. The dam is also planned to be built on an active seismic fault, posing risks of reservoir-induced earthquakes. On top of the catastrophic social and environmental impacts, the project is based on an insufficient understanding of the water balance in Lebanon, and an incomplete consideration of alternatives, favoring expensive large-scale infrastructure instead of an integrated, environmentally conscious water management plan.

While the borrower (the Lebanese Government) claims to have conducted a “thorough” analysis of alternatives, their study relies on very old estimations of Lebanon’s water resources, dating back to the 1960s. It dismisses the recent, more relevant, water assessments that were conducted by the United Nations Development Program which confirm that “there is an overall surplus in the groundwater budget” (UNDP, 2014), and that the groundwater natural recharge amounts to 53 percent of the total renewable water resources. Providing water to Beirut’s population (including refugees) is therefore possible—and more efficient—through the reform of the groundwater sector, and the extraction of the nearby untapped aquifers.

Besides, The National Council for Scientific Research (NCSR) recommends the consideration of alternative solutions to supply Beirut with water given that the Karst-dominated Mount-Lebanon is geologically unsuitable for large dams (NCSR, 2015). According to the Council, the unavoidable water infiltration coupled with the seismic characteristics of the proposed dam locations will render surface storage both inefficient and dangerous. The failures of recently constructed dams in Mount-Lebanon confirm these findings (e.g. the failed dam in Dunniyeh).

The World Bank-funded(!) Strategic Environmental Assessment of the National Water Sector Strategy (SEIA) recommends the scaling-back of the dams’ program considering its social, economic, and environmental constraints. It describes the Bisri Dam as “land greedy,” and criticizes its unrealistic amount of resource exploitation. While the assessment classifies the dam as a “highest-regret” measure, it proposes less risky alternatives, many of which were not adequately studied in the borrower’s analysis of alternatives. In addition to groundwater, the SEIA proposes submarine springs as a viable alternative to consider. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of some of these springs have already been conducted by the NCSR, and yielded very positive results. An estimated 650 Mm3/yr of fresh water (six times the capacity of the Bisri Dam!) can help ensure water security for many years to come.

According to the World Bank’s social and environmental policies, the engagement of stakeholders, including communities, people affected by the projects, and NGOs, is a requirement for the approval of financing. However, the Bisri Dam’s public consultation records show that the overall attitude of all consulted audiences has been strongly opposed to the construction of the dam. People have been expressing disapproval of the compensation rates, the loss of biodiversity and productive lands, and the loss of jobs. Environmental NGOs were completely marginalized during the consultation process. 

Based on the above, we ask the Board of Directors to take urgent action to withdraw the financing of the destructive Bisri Dam and support a sustainable water management plan instead. We believe that the World Bank’s commitments to the Sustainable Development Goals, if respected, can lead to considerable benefits to Lebanon and the region. 

Finally, a recently launched international petitionasking the World Bank to withdraw the financing for the Bisri Dam has gathered more than 6,000 signatories so far.  

Roland Nassour, Coordinator
The National Campaign to Protect the Bisri Valley
Lebanon Eco Movement

“Save the Bisri Dam” FB page: https://www.facebook.com/BisriValley/ 

Past is Present: Settler Colonialism Matters!

On 5-6 March 2011, the Palestine Society at the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) in London will hold its seventh annual conference, "Past is Present: Settler Colonialism in Palestine." This year`s conference aims to understand Zionism as a settler colonial project which has, for more than a century, subjected Palestine and Palestinians to a structural and violent form of destruction, dispossession, land appropriation and erasure in the pursuit of a new Jewish Israeli society. By organizing this conference, we hope to reclaim and revive the settler colonial paradigm and to outline its potential to inform and guide political strategy and mobilization.

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is often described as unique and exceptional with little resemblance to other historical or ongoing colonial conflicts. Yet, for Zionism, like other settler colonial projects such as the British colonization of Ireland or European settlement of North America, South Africa or Australia, the imperative is to control the land and its resources -- and to displace the original inhabitants. Indeed, as conference keynote speaker Patrick Wolfe, one of the foremost scholars on settler colonialism and professor at La Trobe University in Victoria, Australia, argues, "the logic of this project, a sustained institutional tendency to eliminate the Indigenous population, informs a range of historical practices that might otherwise appear distinct--invasion is a structure not an event."[i]

Therefore, the classification of the Zionist movement as a settler colonial project, and the Israeli state as its manifestation, is not merely intended as a statement on the historical origins of Israel, nor as a rhetorical or polemical device. Rather, the aim is to highlight Zionism`s structural continuities and the ideology which informs Israeli policies and practices in Palestine and toward Palestinians everywhere. Thus, the Nakba -- whether viewed as a spontaneous, violent episode in war, or the implementation of a preconceived master plan -- should be understood as both the precondition for the creation of Israel and the logical outcome of Zionist settlement in Palestine.

Moreover, it is this same logic that sustains the continuation of the Nakba today. As remarked by Benny Morris, “had he [David Ben Gurion] carried out full expulsion--rather than partial--he would have stabilised the State of Israel for generations.”[ii] Yet, plagued by an “instability”--defined by the very existence of the Palestinian nation--Israel continues its daily state practices in its quest to fulfill Zionism’s logic to maximize the amount of land under its control with the minimum number of Palestinians on it. These practices take a painful array of manifestations: aerial and maritime bombardment, massacre and invasion, house demolitions, land theft, identity card confiscation, racist laws and loyalty tests, the wall, the siege on Gaza, cultural appropriation, and the dependence on willing (or unwilling) native collaboration and security arrangements, all with the continued support and backing of imperial power. 

Despite these enduring practices however, the settler colonial paradigm has largely fallen into disuse. As a paradigm, it once served as a primary ideological and political framework for all Palestinian political factions and trends, and informed the intellectual work of committed academics and revolutionary scholars, both Palestinians and Jews.

The conference thus asks where and why the settler colonial paradigm was lost, both in scholarship on Palestine and in politics; how do current analyses and theoretical trends that have arisen in its place address present and historical realities? While acknowledging the creativity of these new interpretations, we must nonetheless ask: when exactly did Palestinian natives find themselves in a "post-colonial" condition? When did the ongoing struggle over land become a "post-conflict" situation? When did Israel become a "post-Zionist" society? And when did the fortification of Palestinian ghettos and reservations become "state-building"?

In outlining settler colonialism as a central paradigm from which to understand Palestine, this conference re-invigorates it as a tool by which to analyze the present situation. In doing so, it contests solutions which accommodate Zionism, and more significantly, builds settler colonialism as a political analysis that can embolden and inform a strategy of active, mutual, and principled Palestinian alignment with the Arab struggle for self-determination, and indigenous struggles in the US, Latin America, Oceania, and elsewhere.

Such an alignment would expand the tools available to Palestinians and their solidarity movement, and reconnect the struggle to its own history of anti-colonial internationalism. At its core, this internationalism asserts that the Palestinian struggle against Zionist settler colonialism can only be won when it is embedded within, and empowered by, the broader Arab movement for emancipation and the indigenous, anti-racist and anti-colonial movement--from Arizona to Auckland.

SOAS Palestine Society invites everyone to join us at what promises to be a significant intervention in Palestine activism and scholarship.

For over 30 years, SOAS Palestine Society has heightened awareness and understanding of the Palestinian people, their rights, culture, and struggle for self-determination, amongst students, faculty, staff, and the broader public. SOAS Palestine society aims to continuously push the frontiers of discourse in an effort to make provocative arguments and to stimulate debate and organizing for justice in Palestine through relevant conferences, and events ranging from the intellectual and political impact of Edward Said`s life and work (2004), international law and the Palestine question (2005), the economy of Palestine and its occupation (2006), the one state (2007), 60 Years of Nakba, 60 Years of Resistance (2009), and most recently, the Left in Palestine (2010).

For more information on the SOAS Palestine Society 7th annual conference, Past is Present: Settler Colonialism in Palestine: www.soaspalsoc.org

SOAS Palestine Society Organizing Collective is a group of committed students that has undertaken to organize annual academic conferences on Palestine since 2003.

 


[i] Patrick Wolfe, Settler Colonialism and the Transformation of Anthropology: The Politics and Poetics of an Ethnographic Event, Cassell, London, p. 163

[ii] Interview with Benny Morris, Survival of the Fittest, Haaretz, 9. January 2004, http://cosmos.ucc.ie/cs1064/jabowen/IPSC/php/art.php?aid=5412